Last night I had the opportunity to take part in an hour-long webcasted discussion series known as
Ed Tech Talk. These are talks held completely online about technology in education, as well as education in general. The most valuable thing about these talks, aside from the interesting topics discussed, is the way it brings together educators from all over North America and the rest of the world, allowing them to contribute unique points of view influenced by their location and values of their local communities. The discussion held last night brought together teachers from New Jersey, Virginia, British Columbia, and elsewhere. These talks are generally held three times a week on Sunday, Monday and Wednesday; the Wednesday talks I took part in last night are part of a series known as "Teachers Helping Teachers", where educators specifically discuss topics related to helping each other in their careers.
These online talks use a technology called Livestreaming, which allows many users to log in with their webcams and microphones; everyone views one video channel that displays one webcam at a time, based on who is talking at the moment. This week's discussion was a continuation of one that began last week about a book called
Walk Out Walk On: A Learning Journey into Communities Daring to Live the Future Now. The title refers to "walking out" on traditional or limiting beliefs and "walking on" to create healthy, self-sufficient communities who are able to figure out how to solve their problems using whatever resources they have. The stories take place in countries like Zimbabwe, South Africa, and India, as well as the United States. A member of the chat, Paul, indicated that the author of the book may be joining them on the webcast sometime in January.
A teacher named Monika opened up the chat by pointing out that the United States has largely been unsuccessful in giving foreign aid in the past because it creates dependency in foreigners on the resources Americans bring in to those other countries as well as on America itself; rather, when we go to help other countries, we should work to understand the culture of the people we are helping, and teach them how to help themselves in a way that allows them to retain their cultural identity. Another teacher named Mary Ann pointed out that for many people the notion of "doing unto others" is based on the faulty premise that we are better than the people we are helping, and we need to eradicate this belief if our relief efforts are to be more effective. Another key point made in the discussion is that North Americans often see efficiency as a key virtue in their foreign policy decisions, but sometimes too much efficiency comes at a cost of decreased creativity, which can negatively impact our ability to properly help people.
Many other interesting points were made, and the discussion continued for a little over an hour. A student teacher named Scott also talked briefly about something he's trying in his grade 3 class; instead of chairs, he is allowing students to sit and bounce on exercise balls at their desks. He has found that, so far, it has been really beneficial for certain students' abilities to concentrate in class, and that a local TV news station even did a story on it. Teaching is going to be his retirement job, and he is looking for a school that will allow him the flexibility to try new, creative things like the exercise ball idea.
I really enjoyed having a chance to listen and take part in the discussion, and found it to be a great way to bring like-minded people together with a passion for pushing the envelope in education. Although the discussion about Walk Out Walk On wasn't directly related to traditional K-12 education (although it was about education in general), I thought the idea of understanding the culture of the people we are helping and teaching them to help themselves was actually a great metaphor for how we should do our work as teachers. The trend in education seems to be always moving towards more student-based learning, so as teachers, the more we do to understand our students, their interests, ideas and passions, the better we'll know how to serve them.
As mentioned above, there are many benefits to the technology of online autonomous learning; some include bringing people with similar passions and interests together to share ideas, providing points of view on similar topics and initiatives from people living in different kinds of communities and cultures, the fact that it can all be done with nothing more than a laptop so it's easy to access and you won't be late to the meeting because of traffic or other factors, and the fact that you can bring in guest speakers like the author of Walk Out Walk On who can webcast to people all over the world from wherever they happen to be. There aren't a lot of drawbacks, but some might include the fact that the audio and video froze occasionally, the fact that you can only see one person at a time, you have to have a working high-speed Internet connection, and you can't physically share resources with other teachers. However, I think this kind of education is going to become increasingly popular in the future, as it allows teachers to reach a large number of associates and students in an uncomplicated way.